RICCE, 2023 Vol. ꢀ Nro ꢀ: XX https://dꢁi.ꢁꢂg/ 1ꢃ.48168/RICCE.v1n1p11  
ꢄꢅꢅꢆꢇ://ꢂevistas.uꢈasaꢈꢈe.edu.pe/ꢂicce  
la oposición entRe el aumento  
de la entRopía y la geneRación de  
una complejidad cReciente puede  
aboRdaRse desde una peRspectiva  
infoRmacional  
The opposition between entropy increases and  
the generation of increasing complexity can be  
approached from an informational perspective  
Eugenio Andrade  
Department of Humanities at Universidad El Bosque. Bogotá  
Department of Biology at Universidad Nacional de Colombia  
landradep@unbosque.edu.co/ leandradep@unal.edu.co  
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0133-5251  
Recepción: 12-02-2023  
Aceptación: 01-06--2023  
Abstract  
This paper deals with the discussion between two points of view justified by  
thermodynamics, the tendency to increase entropy, given by the second law, and the  
tendency towards increases in complexity, given by the tentative fourth law. I argue these  
twoperspectivescanbereconciledfromtheperspectiveofinformationprocessingsystems.  
I discuss how living systems counteract entropy through stored chemical free-energy,  
which is used for generating structural or informational constraints. Taking cellular and  
ecological systems as models of open far from equilibrium systems, the formulation of a  
tentative fourth law of thermodynamics is examined. The second and the tentative fourth  
laws of thermodynamics explain why the propensity to approach a state of equilibrium  
with respect to local restrictions promotes further impositions of structural constraints  
that enhances its distancing from equilibrium at a global scale.  
1
1
Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas  
In consequence, while a complete equilibration of the universe will never be attained,  
the trend towards increasing complexity expresses with growing intensity, hence,  
cosmic evolution and the evolution of life on earth can be understood as the outcome  
of two antagonistic and complementary tendencies, first, towards the dissipation of  
energy gradients, generating complex organizations, and second, to the degradation of  
these organizations when no energy flows are available. Therefore, information from the  
prospectiveoftheprocessingsystemsdecreasetheiruncertaintyabouttheirsurroundings,  
enabling them, to select following functional criteria one among the immense accessible  
trajectories that, by canalizing energy flows maximizes its conversion into chemical energy  
that is invested in building and sustaining increasingly complex structures.  
Keywords: Information, Structural constraints, Tentative fourth law, Complexity  
Resumen  
Esteartículoabordaladiscusiónentredospuntosdevistajustificadosporlatermodinámica,  
la tendencia al aumento de la entropía, dada por la segunda ley, y la tendencia al aumento  
de la complejidad, dada por la tentativa cuarta ley. Argumento que estos dos puntos de  
vista pueden conciliarse desde la perspectiva de los sistemas de procesamiento de la  
información. Analizo cómo los sistemas vivos contrarrestan la entropía mediante la  
energía química libre almacenada, que se utiliza para generar restricciones estructurales  
o informativas. Tomando los sistemas celulares y ecológicos como modelos de sistemas  
abiertos alejados del equilibrio, se examina la formulación de una cuarta ley tentativa de  
la termodinámica. La segunda y la cuarta ley tentativa de la termodinámica explican por  
qué la propensión a acercarse a un estado de equilibrio con respecto a las restricciones  
locales promueve nuevas imposiciones de restricciones estructurales que potencian su  
alejamiento del equilibrio a escala global.  
En consecuencia, si bien nunca se alcanzará un equilibrio completo del universo, la  
tendencia hacia una complejidad creciente se expresa con intensidad cada vez mayor,  
de ahí que la evolución cósmica y la evolución de la vida en la Tierra puedan entenderse  
como el resultado de dos tendencias antagónicas y complementarias, en primer lugar,  
hacia la disipación de gradientes de energía, generando organizaciones complejas, y en  
segundo lugar, hacia la degradación de estas organizaciones cuando no se dispone de  
flujos de energía. Por tanto, la información perspectiva de los sistemas procesadores de  
información disminuye su incertidumbre sobre el entorno, permitiéndoles, siguiendo  
criterios funcionales, seleccionar una entre las inmensas trayectorias accesibles que,  
canalizando los flujos energéticos maximice su conversión en energía química que se  
invierte en construir y sostener estructuras cada vez más complejas.  
Palabras clave: Información, Restricciones estructurales, Cuarta ley tentativa, Complejidad  
1
Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas  
1
. introduCCión EnErgy and EpigEnEtiC landsCapEs  
In biology, Waddington [i] showed that unstable high totipotent cells shift to more  
stable differentiated cells, as illustrated by the metaphor of epigenetic landscapes (EL).  
A passage from high potency unstable states to lower energy more stable states that  
according to Simondon1 [ii] requires a transducer, exemplified by continuous electric  
relay that operates as a modulable resistance between a potential energy and its concrete  
mode of actualization through time. The transducer, works as the mediator between the  
unstable high free-energy domain to the concrete realized entities with lower free-energy  
content. In this case the transducer would be the cell itself, undergoing differentiation that  
modulates the steepness of the EL and smooths the energy barriers that open the way down  
the canalized pathways. The discharge of energy from a field of potetialities is modulated  
all the way, till it reaches a metastable state, thus it is irreversible and so requires time.  
The potential is represented as the differences of height between the peak and any region  
located in a valley, though the dynamics of this irreversible process is modulated by the  
changing topography of the EL.  
This a process that does not only runs downhill as energy gradients breakdown, reaching  
metastable states, but as more energy is captured by the transducers or processing  
information systems, it can also run uphill towards potentiation. In this processual  
viewpoint what matters is not only the definition of the states that are in fact attained,  
but mostly how they came to be, and the potential future that is enabled, because  
the process of energy transformation never ends. Time plays a decisive role since not  
all potential energy can be discharged and transformed into realized concrete forms  
at the same time. Information processing involves both a decrease of the potential  
as it crystalizes into concrete ordered forms (actualization), yet there are no stable  
organized structures, but dynamic transient organizations in permanent tension.  
Information processing like transduction is mediated by the very same entities that  
develop and evolve by means of establishing new types of interactions between their own  
disparate constitutive parts and between them and other entities undergoing similar  
processes of morphogenesis.  
1
Transduction is Gilbert Simondon’s key concept for understanding processes of differentiation and of individuation in several  
fields, including scientific disciplines, social and human sciences, technological devices, and artistic domains. Originating in the  
sciences and crucially developed in its philosophical implications by Simondon, transduction refers to a dynamic operation by  
which energy is actualised, moving from one state to the next, in a process that individuates new materialities.  
Paulo de Assis (2018).  
1
Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas  
The topology of the surface of epigenetic and energy landscapes curves, creating folds  
that open up new paths. The existence of a real potential or virtual reality is fundamental  
since it provides the possibility of becoming, by shifting phases from one state to the  
next. “An organism is always more than its organized and fully differentiated reality. This  
excess signal a virtual reality that can be observed at the embryonic stage” (Beistegui  
2
012, 170) [iii].  
All throughout the discussions that follow below, energy transformations are illustrated  
with the image of an energy landscape, a tridimensional model that associates possible  
states with their free-energy content (Figure 1). The higher the free-energy, the more  
numbered, short lived and unstable conformations exist for a given entity, conversely,  
the lower the free-energy, the more reduced the number of states that can be attained  
and the more stable they are. Thus, peaks in the landscape stand for high energy levels  
populated by a number of highly unstable states, and valleys stand for low energy levels  
populated by a reduced number of stable states. The landscape also helps to illustrate the  
energy barriers that have to be surmounted by a given structure in order to pass from one  
state to another. It is also postulated that there is a spontaneous tendency to pass from  
unstable to stable states, that is visualized as a transition from potency to act (realized  
in concrete metastable structures), that requires an increment of entropy by reduction  
of a free-energy gradient. Thence, entropy increases as free-energy landscape tends to  
flatten. Moreover, the free-energy landscape representation serves also to illustrate that  
if energy is available in the surroundings, detected and harvested, a multiplicity of many  
different systems acting simultaneously can catch it up, and the net accumulative effect  
will show up as new arising peaks.  
2
. information is thE morphogEnEtiC prinCiplE of naturE  
Organisms are thermodynamic systems best suited to model energy transformations.  
This proposal appears in several authors such as Prigogine and Stengers [iv], Brooks and  
Wiley [v], Swenson [vi], Chaisson [v] Schneider and Kay [viii], Schneider and Sagan [ix],  
2
among others. In these models, living systems are explained as integrated “totalities” ,  
though structurally constrained and plastic enough to functionally couple with their  
environment in order to capture energy flows, for further conversion, storage and  
efficient use. Therefore, living systems can be explained by resorting to thermodynamic  
notions such as entropy, self-organization, density of energy flow and restrictions.  
However, in addition to thermodynamics, an integrated informational approach from  
the prospective of the living systems is needed. Information will be approached as that  
which drives the passage from potentiality to forms (actualized information) and the  
reverse from actualities to emerging new potencies that enable new more complex  
organizations.  
2
“Kantian wholes” according to Kauffman.  
14  
Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas  
These dynamics can be understood as being regulated by an informational transaction  
between opposite tendencies expressed in the second law (energy gradient equilibration  
and structural decay), and, the tentative fourth law of thermodynamics (emergence of  
more complex organizations that enable new possibilities). Clearly, I am not making a  
conventional use of the notion of information, in the sense of Shannon as a measure of  
ignorance or entropy by an external observer in order to specify one message among all  
the different probable messages that can be emitted by a given source. Instead, I stress  
the information gain that ensues when an agent is prompted to choose between at least  
two alternative responses [x], information that is used by the processing agent to detect  
accessible energy gradients.  
Self-organization is the outcome of energy flows that are made accessible by information  
processing. Dissipative structure is a term defined by Prigogine and Stengers, in order to  
designate the organized patterns visualized in chemical reactions far from equilibrium.  
The study of chemical reactions like Belousov-Zhabotinski in which the concentration  
of the chemical involved were measured during a certain time, showed the existence of  
bifurcations in the trajectories at points of high instability. Self-organization requires  
an intense and permanent flow of energy and matter under conditions of openness  
and non-equilibrium, which spontaneously crystallizes into a specific structural  
arrangement. The emerging system adopts a structure that stabilizes between the  
thermal thresholds defined by the conditions to which the system is subjected. As energy  
flows intensify, systems move further away from equilibrium, reaching unstable critical  
points where one of at least two different accessible alternative conformations turns up.  
Unstable critical points lead to bifurcations that allow access to new contingent and  
unpredictable configurations. Energy flows enable self-organization, but do not specify  
the type of organization generated. The specific form that a system takes depends on the  
restrictions adopted in its strivings to maintain a local organization that is functional  
fit with the environment. Restrictions that are exerted upon the lower levels, make them  
more prone to harvest energy from accesible gradients.  
To talk about energy gradients means that there is a free-energy budget difference between  
the states of high potential “source” and a low potential “sink”. Any living systems as it  
breaks down the chemical bonds of carbohydrates, glucogen and lipids (chemical stored  
energy), its internal entropy lowers because of the gain in realized structural organization  
by means of high chemical energy flow (metabolism). The supply of high potential energy  
that can be converted or stored into new structural arangements, is asured as long as  
energy gradients are accesed and captured. There is a choice at each unstable critical point  
that reduces the uncertainty that the living system faces, as it progresses toward more  
stable states of minimal entropy. At this bifurcation point, whenever any system chooses  
between two equally likely alternatives, the world gains a bit of structural information. In  
other words, information processing guides the choice of route from potential (unbound  
energy) to actual definite forms (stored energy). The permanent reorientation of energy  
1
5
Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas  
flows involves a diversity of agents that interact in a specific environment, trying to define  
the structural adjustments and actions to be carried out.  
In accord to the above guidelines, an integrated notion of information should address the  
intrinsic potentiality of nature, which would be to generate and propagate a maximum  
diversity of organized forms, by means of interactions that generate an increasingly dense  
network of systems that permanently enhance the potential (vitality) of nature. Actualized  
information refers to the organizations currently existing in the present, which at the same  
time constitutes a growing potential of what may be in the future. The imprints of the  
past are incorporated in existing structures (i.e. evolutionary ancestral body plan) that  
enable an unforeseen future. The future exists virtually as an immeasurable potential for  
a multitude of yet undefined events, whose actualization results from the informational  
transactions that are taking place at the present. In other words, the forms that are possible  
and accessible in the immediate future are being hatched through successive transactions  
and sustained feedbacks from the micro to the macro and vice versa, giving rise to a reality  
plenty of unanticipated situations.  
Thus, informational processes meet conflict since entities, in greater or lesser degree of  
individuation, face the possibilities of being destroyed and absorbed by the lower levels  
of organizations, or the opposite, to get integrated into higher order wholes. Following  
Lupasco [xi], when a particular state is achieved or actualized, an opposite state is  
potentialized alternately and reciprocally, given that none reaches the total presence or  
absence. Thus, it is installed a tension between potencies that tend to be actualized, and  
actualized forms that tend to be potentiated.  
Information processing must be understood as the modulating factor between these two  
opposing tendencies, an irreversible tendency towards thermal equilibrium or increasing  
entropy, manifested as flattening of energy gradients (thermal death), and a tendency  
towards increasing complexity, self-organization and higher distancing from thermal  
equilibrium. Information guides processes toward the production of a diversity of more  
or less stable individualized systems within every level of organization (actualization of  
a potential), but also enables new dynamics and interactions that lead to the emergence  
of more complex levels of organization (potentiation of actualities). In biology, we have  
that information processing is not limited to the production of individualized forms along  
ontogenies following the genetic instructions encoded in DNA, but, also to their integration  
at microbial, cellular, multicellular, organismic, communal and ecosystemic scales. In  
consequence, information expresses the transactions between these antagonistic drives,  
as it is processed by organized systems that permanently adjust and interact.  
Therefore, evolutionary processes exhibit two seemingly opposite tendencies: 1) the  
emergence of more complex forms, and 2) the individuation, stabilization and eventual  
16  
Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas  
decay of these forms. Forms are individualized and integrated with each other by  
generating more complex organizations and as they stabilize and diversify. Accordingly,  
Darwinian evolution by natural selection favors individuals that interact in order generate  
new types of symbiotic associations, ontogenies and ways of coupling to the surrounding  
environment. Each emergency enables new types of interactions between previously  
individualized forms, expanding the world of what is possible and so giving rise in due  
time to new forms that become new niches for other possible living systems. These  
evolutionary logic shows the reciprocity of the part/whole relationship. Existing forms  
configure and modify the environment that made them possible through the very actions  
they implement, so that parts and wholes are intimately associated.  
Parts incorporate information of the whole that contains them, while the whole is modified  
by the parts that make it up, thus, the whole contributes to its own transformation by  
constraining its constitutive components.  
3
. thE tEnsion bEtwEEn spontanEous sElf-organization and  
thE inCrEasE of Entropy.  
Strictly speaking, the increase in entropy refers to the degradation of the available energy  
gradients that can be illustrated as a current of water flowing downstream along a path  
that bifurcates to attain more stable sates. However, this current can also flow up hill to  
reach higher potency that will be further actualized in a diversity of stable states. The way  
down to metastable states is accounted by the second law, while the way up to unstable  
states is accounted by the tentative fourth law [xii]. (Table 1)  
From Boltzmann´s mechanical-statistical interpretation of the second law, entropy is  
the spontaneous tendency of organized systems to disintegrate into their components,  
increasing molecular disorder. But the important thing is to understand that any  
organization depends on the net energy flow-through. When systems are in conditions  
of openness and interaction with others, they can cling to accessible sources of energy,  
resulting in a growing organization, but when they approach to isolation and closure, the  
energy flow through decreases and systems equilibrate. Displacements toward the state  
of equilibrium take place with respect to the environment formed by the less complex  
entities that allowed its emergency, so that when the organization decays, its components  
breakdown and are absorbed by the lower levels, so that the state of maximum molecular  
disorder cannot be attained. The hypothetical thermal death of the universe is an  
extrapolation of thermal process occurring in condition of isolation and adiabatic closure.  
Research on how to maximize energy that can be extracted from a combustion machine  
led to the formulation of the second law by Rudolf Clausius. Prior research by Sadí Carnot  
17  
Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas  
had established that for an ideal machine, isolated from heat fluxes and without friction,  
minimizing entropy dissipation would optimize the efficiency of energy conversion into  
mechanical work. A machine would have 100% efficiency only in the ideal case where it did  
not give up heat to the environment. Therefore, efficiency was defined as the proportion  
between the amount of net work performed over the heat transferred that depends on the  
thermal gradient in which it operates, i.e., for steam engines, maximum efficiencies are  
low (<< 40%) because heat waste is considerable.  
The ideal thermal machine was thought of as a closed (adiabatic) mechanical system  
that imposes restrictions on gas expansion so that it is driven to push a non-friction  
plunger, operating on a thermal gradient, maintained by the chemical energy released  
in the combustion. Combustion releases the chemical energy stored in the carbon  
bonds characteristic of hydrocarbons, in a long biogeochemical process. This release  
requires atmospheric oxygen that was generated by water hydrolysis as a byproduct  
of photosynthetic activity carried out by bacteria for thousands of millions of years.  
Decontextualizing the steam machine of the geobiological history responsible for carbon  
fixation and the production of oxygen has made us to forget the importance of processes of  
chemical energy storage. The Industrial Revolution was made possible by the combustion  
machine, and it generated a strong dependence on non-renewable fossil fuels, the capture  
of which has served as an excuse for countless wars motivated by the desire to control  
energy sources. If we compete fiercely for increasingly scarce resources in a Darwinian  
way, fatalism associated with entropy (shortage of available energy) becomes evident and  
threatening.  
But this hopelessness is relieved when we model systems that are far from equilibrium,  
where flows of matter and energy are so widely distributed that they are reinforced to  
generate “dissipative structures”, or stationary states that are located in compartments  
that temporally stabilized the organized structure. Out of the whole solar energy entering  
the system, a great part dissipates as heat into the environment, but a minimal part is used  
to maintain the organization of photosynthetic bacteria, making them more steadfast to  
capture the available energy with more efficiency and so on in a positive unharnessed  
autocatalytic process.  
Processes of self-organization, to the extent that are positively reinforced, allow the  
growth and propagation of the organized systems, but they can also lead to an exhaustion  
of the primary chemical sources, and reach a point where the system breaks down. For  
this reason, energy gradients are consumed in building up structures that act as energy  
barriers that prevent the diffusion of catalysts and the depletion of primary resources.  
For example, catalytic cycles of self-reinforcing reactions, such as those devised by  
Manfred Eigen [xiii], and the self-catalytic ensembles postulated by Stuart Kauffman  
[
xiv] to explain the origin of organic life, are helpful; but it is also essential to consider the  
formation of internal compartments, by means of membranes that prevent the diffusion  
of catalysts, needed for the efficient use of energy.  
1
8
Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas  
The idea that irreversible processes lead to entropy increases that tend to a thermal  
death, would not have prevailed if the study of energy transfers had been based on the  
study on energy flows through cells and ecosystems, instead of the combustion machines.  
th  
Unfortunately, this research program was not interesting in the XIX century, when the  
Industrial Revolution was on the fast track towards industrialization and the ensuing  
mechanization of productive processes. The inexorable thermal death predicted by the  
second law was questioned by James C. Maxwell, when he stated the following paradox.  
If a hypothetical being or “demon” located within a chamber at constant volume and  
pressure could gather information about the position and speed of individual molecules  
and, if it could use this information to control their passage between two compartments,  
it would achieve the separation of fast (hot) molecules from slow (cold) molecules into  
different compartments. The point to remark here is that for Maxwell, if informational  
restrictions are imposed upon the free diffusion of molecules, an orderly system is  
generated in apparent opposition to the stipulations of the second law. Briefly, the point  
to stress is that Maxwell anticipated a general scheme that connects information with  
constraint enforcement and the ensuing generation of order. The paradoxical point was  
that in conditions of adiabatic isolation and closure the energy invested in building up  
the restrictions would not be available.  
Joseph Kestin [xv] formulated a unified principle of thermodynamics according to which,  
when the constraints that act upon an isolated system located some distance from  
equilibrium, are eliminated one by one, it reaches a single state of equilibrium that is  
independent of the order in which constraints are removed. For instance, in a process of  
diffusion of gases at constant volume, the average length of the paths that can be traveled  
by individual molecules as they approach equilibrium, decreases as the occupied places  
restricts their diffusion. Thus, as entropy increases, the tendency to expand and the  
propensity to change decreases. In the case of the container box of particles that move  
at random (modeled by Boltzmann as an equilibrium state of maximum entropy), the  
loss of usable energy is due to molecular diffusion in all possible directions.  
Josiah Willard Gibbs (1870), following Kelvin, defined free-energy, or enthalpy, as a  
thermodynamic potential, that is, an extensive state function with energy units that  
measures the amount of usable energy to perform a work. The change in free-energy is  
defined as ΔF = ΔE - TΔS, a formula that divides the energy content of a system into two  
components: on the one hand, energy available to perform work (E), and on the other,  
entropy (S) or energy not available to perform work. Noteworthy, the contribution of the  
entropic term tends to zero as the absolute temperature decreases. The change in Gibbs  
free-energy provides useful information about the spontaneity of a chemical reaction,  
though it cannot be applied to individual molecules. However, biochemists have shown  
that within the cells, energy is stored in the chemical bonds of the organic molecules  
(
sugars, carbohydrates, lipids, etc.). and the molecules of ATP (adenosine tri-phosphate)  
are known as the energy currency of the cells.  
1
9
Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas  
Erwin Schrödinger [xvi] investigated how organisms are not affected by the entropy  
that they must generate in order to live, a concern that led him to assert that to stay  
away from thermal equilibrium (to grow, to develop and to reproduce) they must capture  
negentropy (negative entropy), that is energy stored in the chemical bonds of organic  
matter. In fact, living beings are poised at a stationary state sustained by an intensive  
ongoing anabolic and catabolic processes. Organisms are thus, characterized as systems  
that do not equilibrate with their environment, since they are organized in such a way  
that they capture, transform, and use all available forms of energy to reach far from  
equilibrium states.  
Furthermore, the study of cellular processes of storage and management of energy  
reserves, allowed Collin McClare [xvii] to distinguish between stored energy (high quality  
energy) and equilibrium energy (entropy)3 . The first is an energy stored chemically in  
cell compartments that is readily available to perform the work needed to remain in non-  
equilibrium distribution, for instance, in active molecules the states of higher energy  
in outer electronic orbits are more populated than those of lower energy. The second,  
thermal energy, mostly represented by molecular vibrations that equilibrate between  
-9 -10  
1
0 to 10 seconds, though usable “slowly” with moderate efficiency, it inevitably ends  
up being thermally equilibrated with the environment, and thus, achieves a temperature-  
dependent Boltzmann distribution. The concept of stored energy introduces a precision  
to the concept of free-energy, because it is defined with respect to a characteristic time  
interval, and so allows its applicability to individual molecules, cell compartments, cells  
and organisms, since every level in the organic hierarchy can be characterized by its own  
temporal scales.  
According to McClare [xviii-xix] organisms are not thermal machines, but isothermal  
systems that depend on the flow of chemical energy that can be stored and used, when  
necessary, as macromolecules act as 100% efficient chemical machines. A cell is a highly  
heterogeneous organized system composed of micro space compartments in which,  
-
14  
various processes in stationary states take place, at time scales ranging from 10 to  
-12  
1
0 seconds, so rapidly and efficiently, that they do not have time to equilibrate. Thus,  
processes of energy release by rupture of chemical bonds are used to synthesize other  
biomolecules within the cell. Consequently, molecular machines, perform work (W) by  
direct transfer of energy stored within the same system and so promote the integration  
of processes at different time scales. The end result is cell efficiency in the use and storage  
3
In other words, it is needed to investigate the flows and transformations of energy into organized systems such as living beings.  
For this reason, various authors have chosen to distinguish energy according to quality, using the notions of exergy and entropy.  
The first corresponds to high-quality energy that can be used by the system under certain conditions of the environment, and the  
second corresponds to low-quality energy, which cannot be used to perform work, and which is therefore dissipated to the outsi-  
de. That is, poor quality energy dissipated by one system can be used and degraded further by another system until its ultimate  
dissipation in heat energy at equilibrium.. In this work I will prefer the term “stored energy”, instead of “exergy” in order to avoid  
terminological confusions.  
ꢉꢃ  
Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas  
of energy, keeping compartments stationary and minimizing thermal dissipation. For  
example, photosynthesis results in amazingly fast and efficient energy transfers away  
from equilibrium: 1) Molecular resonance energies have been estimated at the order of  
-14  
1
0 seconds in the first step of photosynthesis in the green photosynthetic bacterium  
named Chlorobium tepidum. 2) Separation of positive and negative charges in chlorophyll  
molecules at the reactive center formed by the Fenna-Mathews-Olson complex (FMO)  
-13  
[
16] takes place in less than 10 sec. 3) The energy absorbed by hundreds of thousands  
of chlorophylls at the chlorosome is transferred, and part of it dissipates by generating  
vibrations of this protein, creating an energy landscape that funnels the absorption of  
excitations in the reactive center with almost 100% efficiency.  
Consequently, Mae-Wan Ho [xx] highlights the two main conclusions that can be derived  
from the second law. 1) In thermal equilibrium, it is impossible to convert dissipated energy  
as random molecular motion into stored energy. 2) The energy stored in the molecular  
bonds is specifically released and becomes another so quickly that it does not have enough  
time to contribute to the dissipation of entropy.  
This view implies that every organized system like a cell operates as an ecosystem,  
where the flow of energy transactions in the ideal case tends to reach states of minimal  
dissipation to the outside, as a result of the fact that compartments within the system  
efficiently take advantage of energy. The point to emphasize is that, in effect and because  
of the second law, spontaneous processes tend to degrade energy gradients, but given the  
systemic nature of the organization, unprofitable energy in one compartment is exploited  
by another component within the same system, therefore, external dissipation of entropy  
is minimal. In other words, the internal use of energy is maximized by catalyzing the  
system to greater degrees of structuring and organization.  
On the other hand, the study of energy flows in ecosystems prompted Howard Odum  
[
xxi] to show that each structure is characterized by being a specific way of storing and  
4
using energy . Consequently, the value of stored energy in all the productions of nature  
and technology, can eventually be estimated in solar energy equivalents, or the amount of  
energy needed to produce a particular form, assuming that solar radiation was the only  
available source. Odum roughly estimated, in terms of solar radiant energy, the energy  
invested in the construction of each level of biological structuring, taking into account  
all the energy transformations that have supported the biosphere and have accumulated  
into organized structures for billions of years, including human technology in the past  
thousands of years. Solar energy that has entered the planet is very abundant, however, it  
has a very low quality or transformative power in the sense that most of it is lost as entropy.  
In this sense, the amount of stored energy (emergy) constitutes a factor that allows to rank  
4
Odum coined the term “emergy” in order to refer to stored energy. Also, he used the term “exergy” to denote the energy that can  
be used by systems organized under certain environmental conditions. Both terms “emergy” and “exergy” refer to free-energy, the  
former places the accent in its storage and the latter in its usage.  
ꢉ1  
Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas  
the different forms of energy flowing through ecological systems. Let us remember that  
energy quality refers to its efficient use by a user in the economic system of living nature.  
Odum [xxii-xxiii-xxiv] also argued that in ecosystems there is a process aimed at  
maximizing the energy incorporated in any given structure, which determines the  
transformations toward higher quality forms of energy and their storage in structures  
of increasing complexity. This principle of maximum empowerment stipulates that the  
systems that prevail are those that develop the most effective and beneficial work with  
incoming energy sources through a cooperative systemic organization.  
AccordingtoSvenErikJørgensen[xxv], free-energy(exergy)isinvestedinwork, keepingthe  
system as far away as possible from thermodynamic equilibrium, so generating gradients.  
This proposal gave rise to the debate on whether a fourth law of thermodynamics should  
be formulated, since it was no longer just a question of recognizing that entropy increases,  
but that these increases take place at the fastest possible rate. In other words, systems  
tend to move far away from equilibrium as quickly as possible, resulting in highly ordered  
structures. According to Jørgensen and his group [xxvi-xxvii-xxviii], systems tend to use  
available free-energy (exergy) to stay away from equilibrium, and as more free-energy  
is available, they move even faster from equilibrium, resulting in the rise of new energy  
gradients. At unstable critical points, where there is more than one way accessible, the  
system chooses the one that allows the most efficiently work under existing conditions,  
thus taking the fastest path possible, leading to the generation of more complex structures.  
While the second law highlights the depletion of available energy, the fourth law allows to  
focus on the wealth generated as potential, represented in high quality stored energy that  
can be further invested in the generation of organized structure and biomass production.  
Consequently, the fourth law heralds the trend towards developing more complex networks  
wherever energy is used and reinvested in feedback cycles that stabilize restrictions and  
thus facilitate the uptake of more energy-matter.  
This thesis conflicts with the more widespread interpretation of the second law of  
thermodynamics, which establishes an increase of entropy in the universe by dissipating  
energy as heat waste and brings with it the decay of organized systems approaching a state  
of equilibrium, in which all structures are degraded to be absorbed by the lower level of  
poor free-energy content. The difference is that, for Jørgensen, energy gradients degrade  
as quickly as possible, to be used and invested in the construction of highly organized  
systems that store free-energy. Colloquially, we would say that while the second law sees  
the glass of water half empty and gradually running out, the fourth sees it half full, and  
being rapidly refilled. Accordingly, the second law sees the systems in a phase of decay or  
gradual approximation to equilibrium as some forms are actualized, whereas the tentative  
fourth law sees them in their stage of accelerated growth and expansion.  
The second law defines an arrow of time towards disorder because of the mechanical  
and random movements of the constituent particles of matter free of restrictions.  
ꢉꢉ  
Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas  
But we must never forget that particle dispersion conceived by Boltzmann is an idealized  
model formulated for expanding rarefied gases in conditions of closure, a situation that  
does not apply to real systems composed of interacting particles and submitted to flows  
of energy matter. In the absence of energy matter flows, the most likely configurations  
at the macroscopic level correspond to the homogeneous state of equilibrium with the  
environment,whereasinthepresenceofenergymatterflows,themostlikelyconfigurations  
correspond to far from equilibrium heterogeneous organized forms.  
The difference in behaviors between closed systems in near proximity to equilibrium and  
open systems that move away from it, is expressed in the formulation of the tentative  
fourth law of thermodynamics. Accordingly, entropy increases as the degradation of  
energy gradients proceeds, but given that this process takes place at the fastest possible  
rates, it leads to a maximization of stored energy and use efficiency, giving rise to a far from  
equilibrium organized states that are supported by their coupling to new energy sources.  
Consequently, the fourth law prescribes the generation of systems of growing complexity.  
The tentative fourth law corresponds to the way energy transactions take place in  
ecological systems, considering that, 1) processes of energy storage support the generation  
of structures that reinforce energy uptake and efficiency of their use. 2) Living systems  
operate in conditions of openness to the surrounding environment, which allows for the  
permanent exchange and recycling of basic constituent materials. 3) Organized systems  
are stabilized by constraints imposed by negative feedback cycles from the environment to  
the system. 4) Cooperative work between the various constituent subsystems is essential  
to optimize the use of energy.  
According to Crawford Holling [xxix], ecological processes do not follow a linear path  
of potential growth, but a four-stage cycle. 1) Exploration and exploitation of available  
resources by pioneer species. 2) Conservation and consolidation of species with greater  
structural complexity. 3) Relaxation and degradation of the organization by external  
and internal causes. 4) Reorganization of available resources and enhancement of a new  
cycle. The new cycles produce a total increase in biomass and structure in the ecosystem,  
generating a greater number of feedback loops and metabolic pathways, coupled altogether  
to provoke a decrease in entropy dissipation in relation to biomass. However, increasing  
the efficiency of energy transactions results in an increase in the amount of structural  
information, manifested in ever greater species and genetic diversity.  
It goes without saying that in the advanced technological societies of the present, these  
principlesarenotfulfilled, sincetheprevailingglobaleconomicorderdoesnotfavorahighly  
decentralized energy acquisition, cooperation, recycling of materials, or diversification of  
energy sources, let alone the maintenance of the ecological networks that have evolved  
over billions of years.  
ꢉꢊ  
Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas  
4
. information proCEssing lEads to thE implEmEntation of  
struCtural Constraints  
The Maximum Power Principle of Odum, finds a complementary version in the proposal  
of Rod Swenson [xxx-xxxi], who formulated the Principle of Maximum Production of  
Entropy, according to which systems take the path that maximizes the production of  
entropy, in the fastest way according to present restrictions. Consequently, the path that  
globally maximizes entropy by the dissipation of energy gradients, is the same one that  
minimizes its production locally by generating ordered structures or low entropy states.  
In the case of a set of self-catalytic reactions, in which some molecules facilitate the  
formation of more complex ones, depending on an external supply of simpler molecules,  
reaction rates tend to increase exponentially until simple reactants are exhausted by  
dilution and diffusion in the environment, so that the attained organization can no  
longer propagate itself. But if two or more self-catalytic processes are coupled, there is a  
reciprocal constriction between them [xxxii-xxxiii], that would give rise to reaction cycles  
that stabilize and propagate, reinforcing itself in the form of Eigen´s hypercycles or just  
Kauffman´s catalytic self-organized networks. An emerging system can only gain some  
autonomy over the environment, if there is a supply of the simplest primary molecules  
provided by the environment, and retained in microcompartments that prevent their  
diffusion in order to facilitate the propagation of the organization of the entire self-  
catalytic set. Similar mechanisms have been described to explain the reproduction of  
viruses within cells [xxxix]. Likewise, organisms create an immediate environment or a  
niche, so that they can use the stored energy to thrive despite adverse and unexpected  
pressures from the external environment.  
The words restriction and constraint have a negative connotation associated with  
impairment, absence, unfinished status, but, on the other hand, it can also be seen in its  
positive aspect as equivalent to the conditions under which order and organization is  
maintained. The synergistic coupling of two or more self-organizing catalytic processes,  
facilitates the establishment and stabilization of restrictions that keep systems away from  
the equilibrium condition, making it possible to propagate the organization. In other words,  
energy is invested in the construction of structural constraints which, in turn, make the  
work carried out by the release of energy more efficient. In this way, systems evolve toward  
maximum empowerment. For example, a combustion of a certain volume of fuel can  
occur under non-restrictive conditions, as in the case of a Molotov cocktail that causes an  
uncontrolled and destructive explosion, preventing its use, since it abruptly dissipates its  
chemical energy without being harnessed for usage (maximum dissipation of entropy to  
the environment). Otherwise, if the same amount of fuel were burnt in an idealized Carnot  
machine, under conditions of adiabatic isolation and frictionless isothermal expansion,  
it would result in a 100% efficient work transformation, without entropy dissipation, in  
ꢉ4  
Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas  
a quasi-static process that would take an extremely long time, given by a sum of infinite  
reversible steps, to complete the expansion-contraction cycle.  
Although highly efficient, this process is not useful either, because organized systems  
require rapid energy transformation for use as needed, in order to gain in autonomy. The  
optimization of the energy use by an organized system, takes place at a point in which  
the restrictive constraints create a suitable environment or ecological niche protected  
from external influences, so that the work output is used and invested to store energy and  
control its usage in order to feed continuous growth and development. Thence, energy is  
chemically stored for use in the generation of new restrictions that favor the maximization  
of its utilization in the execution of tasks and functions in the available niches that as they  
are created and occupied, open new possibilities for other systems, resulting in energy  
transformation cycles where entropy dissipated into the environment is minimized,  
tending at the limit to a value close to zero.  
Localmaximumreversibleandefficienttransfersofenergytakeplaceasenergyisupgraded  
within the organized system with respect to the basal level of the environment. The idea of  
autonomous agents as self-referential isothermal engines that depend on chemical energy  
gradients has been discussed by Kauffman [xxxv], [xxxvi]. Organized systems evolve to  
the state in which they maximize their ability to execute useful work, but paradoxically,  
in order to achieve the state of maximum conversion of energy into usable work, systems  
must destroy the energy gradients at the fastest possible speed. Interestingly, restrictions  
prevent them from exhausting external energy sources, once they have become dependent  
on internally stored energy.  
According to Ulanowizc [xxxvii] and Kauffman [xxxviii-xxxix], among others, there is a  
tendency of nature to generate systems of increasing complexity without therefore having  
to accept that the increase in complexity must necessarily proceed by a specific route with  
a predefined purpose in advance. The fourth law states that “the biosphere maximizes the  
average secular construction of the diversity of autonomous agents and the ways how these  
agents make a living and propagate further” [xl]. Therefore, processes go through the path  
that degrades gradients as quickly as possible, which is defined by a multitude of factors  
that converge in space-time. The spatiotemporal distribution of living agents and their  
structural properties mirrors the history of the interaction between living systems and the  
environment. But this history must be irreversible and non-ergodic because the space of  
possible accessible states growths much faster than the number of realized states. Thus,  
the probability of returning to a state previously realized in the past is for all practical  
purposes zero. For systems like living cells, organism and biospheres whose phase space  
grows extraordinarily faster than exponential, it cannot be stated beforehand which are  
the ones that are actually to be realized in the next evolutionary step. For this reason,  
Kauffman [xli] coined the term “adjacent possible”, which refers to the set of states that  
are accessible at defined given time. Accordingly, potential information refers to the set of  
ꢉ5  
Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas  
all configurations that can be accessed in one evolutionary step at a given time and place,  
among all imaginable configurations.  
When talking about the set of realized chemical entities in a delimited region of the  
universe, the adjacent possible is the set of new chemicals that can be produced in the  
next reaction step as a result of the interactions. New chemical entities which exhibit  
properties that did not exist previously, will come into being. Yet, information processing  
rules the choice among the options that are really possible and accessible. In other  
words, organized systems, in their interactions with the environment, evaluate physical  
disturbances as possible informational signals that guide the choice of appropriate  
options. In this way, every one of the increasingly complex and diverse forms that emerge  
face a greater number of possible alternatives, some of which will eventually be realized,  
further enhancing the dynamics of evolution. The point however is to understand that the  
space of available options (adjacent possible) increases at much faster rate than the space  
of realized configurations. Thus, the free-energy landscape will pull up towards higher  
energy states that have become the most likely to occur, instead of having to try at random,  
every single configuration one at a time. This problem motivates the formulation of an  
expanded notion of information processing [xlii ], as the factor that guides the decisions  
of energy-consuming agents, and thus, redirects the flow of available energy by imposing  
restrictions on a diversity of systems chaotically distributed over an energy landscape  
that would otherwise tend to flatten.  
Information processing should be understood as the controlled imposition of restrictions  
to ensure the maintenance and propagation of the organization. Ontogenetic development  
is driven by an intense flow of energy that takes place far from thermal equilibrium.  
Following Stanley Salthe [xliii-xliv], it is possible to distinguish three stages through which  
any developing system go: a) Juvenile stage (openness, free of restrictions), b) Mature  
stage (regulated and partially opened, restrictions play a positive role) and c) Senile stage  
(
closure, restrictions play a negative role). These stages were inferred by estimating the  
density of energy flow per unit mass relative to time throughout development. In phase (a),  
at the initial youth stage, the system has not yet been defined as a new entity, resulting in a  
sharp increase in the net flow of energy per unit of mass through the system, so boosting  
an irreversible process of individuation. At this stage, growth is very rapid but it cannot  
continue indefinitely because it would deplete the available energy.  
For this reason, the system adopts restrictions that characterize the stage (b) of maturity.  
This stage is characterized by a grow of internal organization, establishing a steady state  
with respect to the new incorporated restrictions, associated with a maximization and  
stabilizationinthedensityofenergyflow.Inthisway,thedevelopingsystemisindividualized  
and becomes autonomous, while being functionally adapted and specialized. The  
flexibility of the system allows to explore and use various energy gradients, while structural  
constraints play a positive role in enabling, directing and channeling a diversity of pathways  
that are available for energy use. In the terminal stage (c), the developing systems become  
ꢉ6  
Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas  
rigid and hardly respond to external stimuli due to the decrease in energy flow density. So  
structural restrictions play a negative role and prevent the use of new energy gradients,  
causing the individual to lose autonomy and flexibility.  
The traditional view of entropy as the antithesis of information has been questioned [xlv-  
xlvi- xlvii], gaining acceptance the contrary idea that as the first one increases, the second  
also grows, leading to an increase in structure, order and organization, moving further  
away from the fully randomized configuration, widening the gap between the possible and  
the actual. This phenomenon takes place precisely because restrictions channel the flow  
of usable energy and allow its storage by generating structures that go through the stages  
of growth, maturity, decay and disintegration. To increase entropy is to deplete the energy  
that sustains that order and therefore induces degradation. But as discussed above, before  
draining this power, systems generate internal compartments, and explore new available  
energy gradients that will allow them to growth and propagate their organization. If it is  
not possible to build up new energy gradients by storing energy, systems are maintained  
to the maximum degree of organization allowed by available energy flows. Yet, in case of  
complete depletion they are assimilated by the environment formed by the systems of  
lesser complexity that preceded them.  
Moreover, according to Rod Swenson [xlviii], information and entropy go hand in hand,  
given that organizing processes increase the entropy of the universe in a much faster  
and more effective way. As organizational complexity increases, constraints move the  
systems away from equilibrium, causing the reverse tendency to achieving equilibrium  
more strongly. But as profitable sources of energy are destroyed, systems invest it in  
building structures that move the universe further away from equilibrium by means of  
the imposition of new restrictions. In this way, as ever more complex forms emerge, the  
opposite tendency to degrade them increases. The point is that living beings are endowed  
with an ability to detect energy gradients, that are to be converted into higher quality of  
stored energy, an activity that leads to the creation of new gradients.  
The effort of science to develop technologies that diversify access to higher-quality  
energy sources to store and use it efficiently through more complex technological devices,  
is consistent with the way nature operates. What goes against nature is to believe that  
there is only one source of energy available, and that the dominant technology must  
manage its flow in a centralized way. It also goes against the way nature works to dissipate  
gradients from source to sink, without investing in the buildup of constraints that favor  
the maintenance and propagation of the organization. By contrast, the diversity of life  
forms is due to the diversity of energy gradients that can be used and dissipated in a wide  
variety of decentralized ways. Human beings are energy-degrading on an intensive scale,  
but problems arise when this energy sources are captured by few and released dropwise  
for use from a centralized source, and even worse, not constructively invested with high  
efficiency, minimizing external dissipation. Technological societies of the present have  
not yet incorporated the necessary restrictions for the use of the various energy sources  
ꢉ7  
Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas  
between the different compartments or regions in which we are artificially divided  
according to political zones of influence.  
Technological societies must be reorganized in the way cellular and ecological living  
systems operate. It is therefore urgent to overcome the dependence of fossil fuel, in order  
to give priority to the exploitation of a diversity of sources with greater efficiency in their  
storage and conversion. In addition, social modes of cooperation must be promoted, so  
that energy stored in the products of one sector are made available to another without  
the production of waste or non-recyclable materials. Energy, in the economy as in nature,  
must flow cyclically in its mature and stable phases, approaching zero dissipation, while  
the exponential growth phases must be based on the cooperative work of a huge number  
of microsystems that permanently harvest and store the energy that contribute to the  
empowerment of the whole ecosystem, so promoting the emergence of a more complex  
level of organization. Rapid growth stages due to the collective permanent harvesting,  
storage and usage of energy, must lead to lasting periods of stability and homeostasis.  
5
. lifE is a flow of EnErgy ControllEd by information  
Eric Chaisson [xlix] considered that Shannon-inspired measures on the content of  
information in bits were not interesting in addressing physical, biological and technological  
evolution. Instead, the focus should be placed on energy, understood as the source of the  
organization at different levels, as Lotka and Odum had initially pointed out [l-li] [lii-  
liii-liv]. Chaisson soon realized that although a star has a lot more energy, estimated in  
absolute values than a bacterium, the latter is more complex. Accordingly, he defined a Ф  
parameter, -total energy flow per unit of mass per unit of time-, which measures the free-  
energy used per second per unit of mass (ergs/sec/gm), i.e., the energy available to build  
structural and functional complexity. The Ф parameter does not measure total energy, but  
the density of its flow. His results show that the estimated Ф value for the sun (Ф = 2) has  
roughly two orders of magnitude less than a plant (Ф = 900). That is, although the sun  
uses energy based on nuclear fusion, it is surprisingly, a much less energy dense system  
and so less complex, compared to a plant that uses chemical and quantum processes in  
photosynthesis. That is, much more energy flows through the same mass per unit of time  
in a plant than through an equivalent mass of the sun.  
Chaisson reported relative values dependent on system mass, composition and efficiency.  
He showed that nature is apparently governed by a principle of optimizing energy  
use. Consequently, evolution is governed by what he called the “principle of energy  
compression,” according to which energy flows (harvested, stored, transformed, used,  
degraded) by complex adaptive systems form an emerging hierarchy of developmental  
systems, ranging from galaxies to human societies, including our technological systems.  
The complexity of an emerging system would be a function dependent on Ф, that in the  
ꢉ8  
Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas  
case of the known universe describes an exponential growth curve from the inflationary  
expansion approximately 300,000 years after the big bang to the present, 14 billion years later.  
Open systems, far from the thermodynamic equilibrium, capture and use energy, which  
they invest in the formation of restricted structures that channel and guide the flow of  
energy [lv- lvi]. In this sense, Ф is not only a measure of structural complexity, but also  
of system’s adaptive responsiveness. The complexity of a structure can be estimated as a  
function of the energy density or the rate at which free-energy circulates per unit of mass.  
The constructive capacity of the system and its complexity is directly proportional to the  
density of the energy flow (erg/sec/gr) [lvii], which has increased throughout cosmic  
5
history at an exponential rate . That is, information should be understood as the ability to  
channel energy by unit of mass and time, generating and maintaining structures necessary  
to ensure increases in complexity. As a result, the ability to process the information  
increases.  
Every new level of organization that emerges accumulates and compresses the relevant  
information contained in less complex previous systems so that it can cope with more  
complex and demanding environments by executing more complex tasks and functions.  
Consequently, new systems contain the relevant information of precursors incorporated  
into their structure, so that as more complex levels emerge, new potential information can  
be actualized in future situations. In this sense, the total information of the universe grows  
with complexity, as well as the tendency of systems to stay as far away as possible from  
thermal equilibrium. The alleged opposition between constructive impulses to increasing  
complexity (growth of both potential and actualized information) and a degrading  
tendency towards absorption by the less complex systems (maximum entropy and absence  
of free-energy), reflects a profound characteristic of nature in which opposing forces or  
tendencies operate simultaneously across all levels of organization. The state of any given  
system is the result of the informational transactions made by the organizing systems in  
order to relieve this tension.  
Therefore, the lower levels optimize the capture, storage and use within the restrictive  
conditions imposed on them by the emerging higher system. In other words,  
maximizing the power or work exercised by an organized system, is the outcome of a  
compromise between opposing tendencies to restore global equilibrium, moving as far  
away as possible from it at the local level. In the exploration of the space of possible  
configurations, a maximum action (energy use) that allows to orient all resources  
toward the search for the paths leading to the faster degradation of the energy gradients  
is observed. The information gathered by the organizing systems allows to detect the  
5
The average density of estimated energy rates in [erg/s/g] and age in giga-years for human society (aged 0 giga-years old)  
has been estimated Ф = 500.000 [erg/s/g], in Ф = 40.000 for animals (aged 0.5 giga-years old), in Ф = 3,900 for plants (aged  
.0 giga-years old), Ф = 75 for the geosphere (aged 4 giga-years old), Ф = 2 for the sun (aged 5 giga-years old), and Ф = 0.5 for the  
milky way (aged 12 giga-years old).  
3
ꢉ9  
Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas  
energy gradients to be used, we are thus inevitable trapped in a non-tautological circular  
process, like a spiral that opens and widens, diversifies and reintegrates continuously in a  
wholly unpredictable manner.  
The alleged opposition between entropic and organizing tendencies leads to an  
understanding of the hierarchical organization of nature through the magnifying glass  
of an ontology of processes, in which these tendencies act simultaneously, one described  
by the second law (decreasing available free-energy) and the other one by tentative fourth  
law (increasing access to free-energy) thus, generating complex forms. As explained,  
information regulates the restrictive settings that direct the flow of energy and guides  
the election at unstable points where trajectories bifurcate. Consequently, the energy  
flow available in the surroundings promotes the generation of more complex systems  
that are plastic enough to redirect and channel the flow of energy in various ways by  
imposing restrictions that increases the density of energy flow.  
Therefore, natural selection has favored the autonomy of living beings or agents that  
collectivelynegotiatetheeffectsoftheseopposingimpulses,thuspromotingmorphogenetic  
processes as greater densification of the energy flow is achieved. Meanwhile the higher  
efficiency of the lower levels represented in the transformation of solar energy made  
by photosynthetic bacteria and its transformation by microbiome, is enhanced. Living  
systems do not evolve according to premises defined by initial conditions and an invariant  
law, on the contrary, they gain and create information, maximize their potential for  
action and modify themselves, so channeling processes oriented to the achievement of  
configurations that were not predetermined by the initial conditions.  
Conclusions  
The cosmological consequence of this approach would be the need to acknowledge the  
existence of two opposing and complementary tendencies in the universe: the first toward  
the generation of ordered forms of growing complexity (fourth law of thermodynamics)  
and the second toward increase of dynamic disorder (second law of thermodynamics).  
As explained so far, life exists as a local organization maintained by a highly dense flow  
of energy, because the universe as a global system tends to move toward thermodynamic  
equilibrium and in doing so gets further away from it. In the same way, the universe also  
faces restrictions given by gravitational forces that condense matter in certain regions,  
preventing its homogeneous dispersion. Moreover, according to Lee Smolin, the appearance  
of black holes gives stability to the universes that contain them, making them more like  
living organizing structures than a dispersive Boltzmann gas. In this sense, the origin of  
life meant the emergence of more efficient routes for the capture, storage and use of energy  
gradients through the generation of highly organized structures.  
ꢊꢃ  
Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas  
Analyzes based on the second law are paradoxical, if one does not consider that life  
must ensure the maintenance and conservation of the dissipative pathways, developing  
innovative strategies for efficient capture and usage of energy gradients. This objective  
is achieved by minimizing the overall production of entropy through the reuse of energy  
by other agents that couple with each other, resulting in highly integrated symbiotic and  
ecological networks of interaction. Living systems are organized systems with structural  
and genetic memory, that facilitate the propagation of dissipative processes, thanks  
to the fact that energy, as it is consumed, is invested to boost growth, development and  
reproduction, while becoming available to potential predators. If we view the earth as an  
open thermodynamic system, terrestrial life manages to capture a small fraction of solar  
radiation, that is transformed into energy stored in chemical bonds. However, while solar  
energy is of very low quality and dissipates mostly in the environment, the stored chemical  
energy is of high quality, allowing a high efficiency in its use by intracellular enzymatic  
systems, promoting metabolism and self-organization, as explained by the tentative  
fourth law [lviii-lix-lx].  
As I have shown, the tendency to form stationary states away from equilibrium does  
not lead to global equilibrium (thermal death), but rather to a departure from it. These  
complex dynamics underpins the ecological interpretation of the second law, which led to  
the formulation of the fourth law. Most of the scientific community consider the latter to  
be a specification of the second, and therefore it would not be necessary to formulate it.  
For my part, I argue that far from equilibrium open systems like living systems are more  
general, while near to equilibrium closed systems like thermal machines, are very specific  
and artificial cases. From an informational perspective that places creative evolution as a  
central aspect, the fourth law must be accepted, to the extent that it allows to imagine the  
universe as a process of emergency and permanent degradation, where information rules  
a dynamic opposition between tendencies toward increasing complexity and the opposite  
tendency to systems’ degradation that are swallowed by the lower levels or organization.  
In this perspective, the role of Darwinian natural selection would be no other than to  
preserve and favor systems sufficiently plastic to respond to the sudden changes in the  
environment, in other words, those that process information more efficiently. We must  
discuss what is meant when we say that a living system can incorporate information  
from the environment. This problem refers to the circularity and reciprocity of relations  
between organisms and the environment. While the latter imposes restrictions on the  
structure in growth and development, the living system does not suffer passively from this  
imposition, but according to its perceptual system (set of sensory structures that allow it to  
probe the environment according to certain thresholds of sensitivity) and organizational  
structure (internal processing modules, connected to motor effector structures) defines  
the type of structural adjustment or modification to be adopted, as well as the action to be  
implemented.  
ꢊ1  
Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas  
A structure has incorporated information from the environment when in its  
adjusting gains stability, becoming more constrained in that environment. Structural  
accommodations are constraints that lower the entropy of macromolecular component  
subsystems; however, these lower-levels of organization (genetic and molecular) do not  
determine the phenotypic structural states, but rather make them possible. Information  
has an intrinsic value to the extent that it helps the organizing system to detect energy  
gradients that can be used. The idea of information as formulated by Shannon has been  
reduced to set of binary elections made by observers located at the higher level, in order  
to reduce the uncertainty about the lower levels, without any consideration for its  
meaning and value. The idea of information processing must include the using system  
and so, it is best understood as the contingencies faced by any living systems that strive  
to buffering the tension between lower and higher levels of organization by choosing  
the corresponding structural adjustments and the actions to be executed in order to  
efficiently capture and employ energy.  
Living systems select few among the many possibilities given by the lower complex levels  
and the rife alternatives offered by the surrounding environment. There is a tendency of  
nature to generate systems of increasing complexity without therefore having to accept  
that this increase should proceed through a specific route with a predefined purpose.  
On the contrary, I argue for the existence of multiple ways to increase complexity, but  
the definition of which are the ones that take place, is due to a multitude of factors that  
contingently converge in a specific space-time situation. The metaphor of informed choice  
made by the organized system, is used to explain the transit from the immense potential  
options and those that in fact take place.  
This choice is a preference made by living systems, rather than a random elimination  
of other alternatives. Information as a generative process of increasingly complex and  
diverse forms, faces a greater number of possible choices at each step, some of which are  
eventually accomplished, further enhancing the evolutionary dynamics of the universe.  
As I have claimed, information guides the decisions faced by the agents in order to direct  
the flow of available energy, feeding a potential as restrictions are imposed on systems  
composed of subsystems that would otherwise tend to be evenly distributed. The choice  
in question is the result of information transactions that actualize potencies, while  
potentiating actualities, thus triggering a process of antagonist and complementary  
tendencies: 1) towards increasing complexity, and 2) to the degradation and subsumption  
by lowers level of organization. Information is the transactional buffering that regulates  
this tension by the action of organized living systems.  
To end up there is not a single overarching arrow of time, but a multiplicity of processes  
going on at different places in the universe, while some of them might have attained levels  
of organized complexity unthinkable for us, others might be just emerging and beginning  
to expand, and surely many are decaying and breaking apart and being swallowed by  
black holes.  
ꢊꢉ  
Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas  
References  
xAndrade, E. Integration of Thermodynamic,  
quantum and Hierarchical theories of Infor-  
mation in the Context of Peircean Semiosis.  
BioSystems (2014) 120: 10-20.  
i
Conrad H. Waddington, The Strategy of genes.  
Genetic assimilation. Advances in Genetics  
1961) 10: 257-293.  
(
ii  
(
Paulo de Assis Transduction and Ensembles  
xi  
Lupasco, S. Le principe d’antagonisme et la lo-  
of Transducers:Relaying Flows of Intensities.  
In: Transpositions: Aesthetico-Epistemic Ope-  
rators in Artistic Research Edited by Michael  
Schwab. 2018 by Leuven University Press /  
Universitaire Pers Leuven ORPHEUS INSTI-  
TUTE SERIES. pp: 245-265. DOI https://doi.  
org/10.11116/9789461662538)  
gique de l’énergie - Prolégomènes à une scien-  
ce de la contradiction, Coll. Préface de Basarab  
Nicolescu. Actualités scientifiques et industrie-  
lles, n° 1133, Paris, 1951; 2ème édition : Le Rocher,  
Coll. “L’esprit et la matière”, Paris, 1987.  
xii  
Kauffman, S. Investigations. Oxford: Oxford  
University Press, 2000.  
iii  
Beistegui, M. de. 2012. “Science and Ontology:  
xiii  
From Merleau-Ponty’s Reduction to Simon-  
don’s Transduction.” In Gilbert Simondon. Be-  
ing and Technology, edited by Arne De Boever,  
Alex Murray, Jon Roffe, and Ashley Woodward,  
Eigen, M. Self-organization of matter and  
the evolution of biological macromolecules.  
Naturwissenschaften 1971 (58): 465-523.  
xiv  
Kauffman, S. The Origins of Order Self-Orga-  
154–175. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University  
nization and Selection in Evolution. New York:  
Oxford University Press, 1993.  
Press.  
iv  
Prigogine, I.; Stengers, I. Order Out of Chaos.  
xv  
Kestin, J. A Course in Thermodynamics. Pu-  
Man’s New Dialog with Nature. New York: Ban-  
tam Books, 1984.  
blished by Taylor & Francis. University of Cali-  
fornia. 1979. Vol.2. Chap. 14, p. 27.  
v
Brooks, D.; Wiley, E.O. Evolution as Entropy.  
xvi  
Schrodinger, E. [1948] ¿Qué es la vida? Bar-  
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.  
celona: Tusquets Ed, 2001.  
vi  
Swenson, R. Emergent attractions and the  
xvii  
McClare, C W. .F. Chemical machines, Maxwe-  
ll’s demon and living organizations Journal of  
Theoretical Biology. 1971 (30):1-34.  
law of maximum entropy production. Founda-  
tions to a theory of general evolution. Systems  
Research 1989 (6):187-197.  
xviii  
McClare, C W. .F. Chemical machines, Maxwe-  
vii  
Chaisson, E.J. Cosmic Evolution. The Rise of  
ll’s demon and living organisms. Journal of  
Theoretical Biology (1971) 30:1-34.  
Complexity in Nature. Cambridge: Harvard  
University Press, 2001.  
xix  
McClare, C W. .F. 1975. How does ATP act as an  
viii  
Schneider; E.D.; Kay, J.J. Life as a manifesta-  
energy source? In: Energy Transformation in  
Biological Systems. Ciba Foundation Sympo-  
sium 31 (New Series), pp. 301-325.  
tion of the second law of thermodynamics.  
Mathematical and Computer Modeling. (1994)  
1
9 (6-8) 25-48.  
xx  
Ho M. W. Do Organisms Contravene the Se-  
ix  
Schneider; E.D.; Sagan, D. Into the Cool. Ener-  
cond Law? The rainbow and the worm. The  
Physics of Organisms. Singapore: World Scien-  
tific Publishing Co., 2008. Pp:13-23.  
gy Flow, Thermodynamics and Life. Chicago:  
The University of Chicago Press, 2005.  
ꢊꢊ  
Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas  
xxi  
xxxi  
Swenson, R. Spontaneous Order, Autocata-  
Odum, H .T ., 1996. Environmental Accounting:  
EMERGY and environmental decision making.  
New York: John Wiley, 1996.  
kinetic Closure, and the Development of Spa-  
ce-Time. Annals of the New York Academy of  
Sciences (2000), pp. 311-319.  
xvii  
Odum, H .T . Self-organization, transfor-  
xxxii  
Deacon, T W. . Incomplete Nature: How Mind  
mation and information. Science 1988. 242  
Emerged from Matter. Nueva York: W W. . Norton  
and Company, 2012.  
(
4882): 1132-1139.  
xxiii  
Odum, H .T . Ecological and General Systems:  
xxxiiiDeacon, T W. . Emergence: The hole at the  
wheel’s hub. In P. Clayton, & P. Davies, eds., The  
Re-Emergence of Emergence: the emergentist  
hypothesis from science to religion. Boston:  
MIT Press, 2006. Pp: 111-150.  
An Introduction to Systems Ecology (rev. ed.)  
Niwot: University Press of Colorado, 1994.  
xxivOdum, H .T . Environmental Accounting:  
Emerging and Environmental Decision Making  
New York: John Wiley, 1996.  
xxxiv  
Nick Lane. The Vital Question. (London:  
xxv  
JØrgensen, S.E. Toward Thermodynamics of  
Profile Books 2015).  
Biological Systems. WIT Transactions on State  
of the Art in Science and Engineering, 2011 (51):  
xxxvKauffman, S. Investigations, Oxford: Oxford  
University Press 2000.  
1-19.  
xxxvi  
Herrmann-Pillath, C. The Evolutionary  
xxvi  
JØrgensen. S.E.; Patten, B.C.; Straskraba, M.  
000. Ecosystems emerging. 4. Growth. Ecol.  
Approach to Entropy: Reconciling Georges-  
cu-Roegen’s Natural Philosophy with the  
Maximum Entropy Framework. Ecological  
Economics (2011) 70: 606–616.  
2
Model. (2000) 126, 249-284.  
xxvii  
JØrgensen, S.E.; Svirezhev Y, . Toward a ther-  
modynamic theory for ecological systems.  
Amsterdam: Elsevier 2004.  
xxxvii  
Ulanowicz, R.E. A Third Window: Natural  
Life beyond Newton and Darwin. West Cons-  
hohocken, PA: Templeton Foundation Press,  
xxviii  
JØrgensen, S.E.; Robert Ulanowicz, R.E.  
2
009.  
Network calculations and ascendency ba-  
sed on eco-exergy. Ecol. Model. (2009) 220,  
xxxviii  
Kauffman, S. Antichaos and adaptation.  
1
893-1896.  
Scientific American (1991) 265 (2): 78-84.  
xxix  
Holling, C.S. The resilience of terrestrial  
xxxix  
Kauffman, S. The Origins of Order: Self-Or-  
ecosystems: local surprise and global change.  
In Sustainable development of the Biosphere,  
ed. W.C. Clark and R.E. Munn, 292-317. Cambri-  
dge: Cambridge University Press 1986.  
ganization and Selection in Evolution. New  
York: Oxford University Press, 1993.  
xl  
Kauffman, S. Investigations. Oxford: Oxford  
University Press, 2000.  
xxx  
Swenson, R. Autocatakinetics, evolution  
xli  
Kauffman, S. Investigations. Oxford: Oxford  
and the law of maximum entropy production:  
a principled foundation towards the study of  
human ecology. Advances in Human Ecology, 6  
University Press, 2000.  
xlii  
Andrade, E. 2014. Integration of Thermody-  
(
1997), pp. 1-46,  
namic, quantum and Hierarchical theories of  
ꢊ4  
Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas  
liv  
Information in the Context of Peircean Semio-  
sis. BioSystems 120: 10-20.  
Odum, H .T . Ecological and General Systems:  
An Introduction to Systems. Niwot: University  
Press of Colorado, 1994.  
xliii  
Salthe; S.N. Development and Evolution.  
lv  
Complexity and Change in Biology. Cambridge  
MA: A Bradford Book. The MIT Press. 1993. Pp:  
Prigogine; I.; Stengers; I. Order out of Chaos.  
Man’s new dialog with nature. New York: Ban-  
tam Books, 1984.  
9
, 45 and 181-185;  
lvi  
xliv  
Zurek, W.J. Algorithm information content,  
Salthe, S.N. Energy, Development, and se-  
Church - Turing Thesis, Physical Entropy, and  
Maxwell’s demon. In: Zurek, W.H (ed.), Com-  
plexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Informa-  
tion, SFI Studies in the Sciences of Complexity,  
Vol. VIII. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley, 1990.  
Pp: 73-89.  
miosis. In Edwina Taborsky ed. Semiosis, Evo-  
lution, Energy: Towards a Recognition of the  
Sign. 1999. Pp: 245-261.  
xlv  
Brooks, D.; Wiley; E.O. Evolution as Entropy.  
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.  
xlvi  
Fraustchi, S. Entropy in an Expanded Uni-  
lvii  
Chaisson, E. 2002. Follow the Energy: Ele-  
verse, Science (1982) 217: 593-599.  
vation of Cosmic Evolution for Human His-  
tory.”In: Historically Speaking: Journal of His-  
torical Society. (2002) 6 (5): 26-28.  
xlvii  
Layzer, D. The Arrow of Time. Scientific  
American (1975) 233: 56-69.  
lviii  
Schneider, E.D.; Kay, J.J. Life as a Manifes-  
xlviii  
Swenson, R. Emergent attractors and the  
tation of the Second Law of Thermodyna-  
mics. Mathematical and Computer Modelling,  
law of maximum entropy production: Founda-  
tions to a theory of general evolution. Systems  
Research (1989) 6: 187-197.  
(
1994) Vol 19, No. 6 - 8, pp. 25-48.  
lix  
Schneider, E.D.; Sagan, D. Into the Cool. Ener-  
xlix  
Chaisson, E.J. Cosmic Evolution. The Rise  
gy Flow, Thermodynamics and Life. Chicago:  
The University of Chicago Press, 2005.  
of Complexity in Nature. Cambridge: Harvard  
University Press, 2001.  
lx  
Ulanowicz, R.E.; Hannon, B. Life and the Pro-  
l
Lotka, A. Contribution to the Energetics of  
duction of Entropy. Proc. Royal Society London  
B, (1987) 232: 181 – 192 Appendices  
Evolution. Proposals of the National Academy  
of Sciences (1922) 8: 147-151.  
Table 1. The table shows the contrasting cha-  
racteristic between the second law of ther-  
modynamics and the tentative fourth law as  
discussed in the text.  
li  
Lotka, A. Natural Selection as a Physical Prin-  
ciple. Proposals of the National Academy of  
Sciences (1922) 8: 151-154.  
liiOdum, H .T . Self-organization, transformation  
and information. Science (1988) 242 (4882):  
1132-1139.  
liii  
Odum; H .T . Environmental Accounting:  
Emerging and Environmental Decision Ma-  
king. New York: John Wiley, 1996.  
ꢊ5  
Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas  
Appendices  
Table 1. The table shows the contrasting characteristic between the second law of  
thermodynamics and the tentative fourth law as discussed in the text.  
Second Law  
Fourth Law  
Entropy (low quality energy)  
Carnot, Clausius, Boltzmann  
Free-energy, high quality energy  
Odum, Jorgensen, Kauffman  
Modeled studying efficiency of thermic  
machines  
Modeled studying ecosystems and cell  
energy transactions  
Degradation of energy gradients, decreasing  
potency  
Rise in complexity, increasing potency,  
creation of new energy gradients  
Closure and isolation, low energy flow  
Local Equilibrium  
Openness and interaction, high energy flow  
Global Distancing from Equilibrium  
Structural decay and absorption by lower  
levels  
Structure buildup and emergence of higher  
levels of organization  
Arrow of time => thermal death  
Arrow of time => increasing organization  
Figure 1  
A two-dimensional profile of energy gradients is depicted. in which the “Y” axis stands  
for free-energy content and, “X” axis for time. Figure (a) represents the passage from  
potency to its actualization as a stable state by a single discharge of energy contained in  
the input. Figure (b) shows how the previous process can be more complex as more energy  
is incorporated all along and so new intermediary states are passed through. Figure (c)  
shows a case in which a low free-energy state can be potentiated by incoming energy that  
pushes the attainment of stable high energy states.  
ꢊ6