Instead of science, why not do logic
Abstract
This article shows that the modus operandi of Nature in its most general form is practical, and that is: individuals interact with individuals and modify and regulate themselves autonomously. It is practical logic, which we learned from the philosophy of language, but which we find again in social languages, in biology and ecology, and in mechanics. Recalling Isaac Newton who could measure, but not understand, the force of gravity, we now turn his natural philosophy upside down so that understanding prevails. With this article the author wants to make a proposal that implies a shift in the objectives of scientific research, to orient it towards the investigation of the logic of Nature, taking into account how it produces itself and what is the language of its own mode of management. This focuses the dispersion of studies that prevails today in the sciences in what always was and should have been its central objective: to understand the logic of nature. The study is framed in a critique of globalized culture in any of its three socio-economic blocks, since all of them have become uniform to develop their political-military power and be in a position to play international politics. The Western, the Russian and the Chinese. We also intend to prepare the sciences to act in a multipolar world in which different logics of thought will converge together with different cultural versions of humanity.
Downloads
References
Aristóteles (2000). Metafísica. Editorial Sudamericana
Crick, M. (1976) Explorations in Language and Meaning Towards a Semantic Anthropology. Malaby Press
Miró Quesada, F. (1982) Nuestra lógica, Revista Sudamericana de Filosofía, III,1, 3 – 16.
Newton, I. (1993, 1687): Principios matemáticos de la Filosofía natural. Ediciones Altaya, S.A.
Helberg, H. (2007) Dimensiones de la realidad. UNMSM, Facultad de Educación – Programa de Educación Intercultural Bilingüe..
Helberg H. (2019) Filosofía de la experiencia. SUR Análisis S.A.C.
Polanyi, M. (1966) The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday & Co.
Platón (1871) Crátilo: Obras completas.Patricio de Azcárate.
Wittgenstein, L. (2001) Philosophische Untersuchungen. Kritisch-genetische Edition. Herausgegeben von Joachim Schulte in Zusammenarbeit mit Heikki Nyman, Eike von Savigny und Georg Henrik von Wright. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag
Wittgenstein, L.(1988) Investigaciones filosóficas. Editorial Grijalbo
Wittgenstein, L. (1978) Bemerkungen über die Farben/ Remarks on Colour. University of California Press,
Wittgenstein, L. (1970) Über Gewiβheit. Anscombe y G.H. von Wright. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Wittgenstein, L. (1975) Bemerkungen über Frazers “The Golden Bough”. Vorbemerkung von Rush Rees. En: Die soziaklwissenschaftliche Relevanz von Wittgensteins Sprachphilosophie. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Copyright (c) 2023 Iberoamerican Journal of Complexity and Economics Sciences
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors transfer exclusively the right to publish their article to the Iberoamerican Journal of Complexity and Economics Sciences, which may formally edit or modify the approved text to comply with its own editorial regulations and with universal grammatical standards, before its publication; Likewise, our journal may translate the approved manuscripts into as many languages as it deems necessary and disseminate them in various countries, always giving public recognition to the author or authors of the research.