Instead of science, why not do logic

Abstract

This article shows that the modus operandi of Nature in its most general form is practical, and that is: individuals interact with individuals and modify and regulate themselves autonomously. It is practical logic, which we learned from the philosophy of language, but which we find again in social languages, in biology and ecology, and in mechanics. Recalling Isaac Newton who could measure, but not understand, the force of gravity, we now turn his natural philosophy upside down so that understanding prevails. With this article the author wants to make a proposal that implies a shift in the objectives of scientific research, to orient it towards the investigation of the logic of Nature, taking into account how it produces itself and what is the language of its own mode of management. This focuses the dispersion of studies that prevails today in the sciences in what always was and should have been its central objective: to understand the logic of nature. The study is framed in a critique of globalized culture in any of its three socio-economic blocks, since all of them have become uniform to develop their political-military power and be in a position to play international politics. The Western, the Russian and the Chinese. We also intend to prepare the sciences to act in a multipolar world in which different logics of thought will converge together with different cultural versions of humanity.