Synergy of AI and Human Factors: Innovation and Complexity in the Development of New Products in Industry 4.0

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Complexity, Product Innovation, Industry 4.0, Human-Technology Synergy

Abstract

This paper explores how Industry 4.0, based on advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), cyber-physical systems, and big data, transforms new product development (NPD) by integrating human and technological factors. The complexity approach is analyzed as a theoretical framework for understanding nonlinear, adaptive, and emergent interactions in complex production systems. The research identifies challenges and opportunities in sustainable value creation, highlighting the importance of human-technology collaboration. Technological tools are analyzed, and hybrid decision models are proposed to address uncertainty and enhance innovation. It also highlights how AI can amplify human creativity by offering predictive capabilities that complement human judgment. The paper concludes that the synergistic integration of AI and human factors is essential to address the complexity of modern systems and promote sustainable and innovative development. Recommendations include fostering adaptive models, designing hybrid tools, and strengthening multidisciplinary training in complex environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahumada-Tello, E., Evans, R. (2023). Human factors, innovation and technology, and cluster strategies as triggers of new product development. Procedia CIRP. 119, 179-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.03.090

Ahumada-Tello, E., Evans, R. (2023b). A Complexity-based Framework for Social Product Development. Procedia CIRP. 119. 1204-1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.05.009

Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., & Byrne, J. C. (2014). Complex adaptive systems theory and firm product innovativeness. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. DOI: 10.1016/J.JENGTECMAN.2013.09.003

Anantrasirichai, N., & Bull, D. (2020). Artificial intelligence in the creative industries: a review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55, 589-656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10039-7

Barile, S., Bassano, C., Piciocchi, P., Vito, P., & Spohrer, J. C. (2022). Algorithms and Human Creativity: Threats or Opportunities? The Human Side of Service Engineering. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002563

Benabdellah, A. C., Bouhaddou, I., & Benghabrit, A. (2019). Holonic multi-agent system for modeling complexity structures of Product Development Process. 2019 4th World Conference on Complex Systems (WCCS). DOI: 10.1109/ICoCS.2019.8930714

Canan, M., Sousa-Poza, A., & Dean, A. (2017). Complex Adaptive Behavior of Hybrid Teams. Procedia Computer Science, 114, 139-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2017.09.013

Casadiego, J., Nitzan, M., Hallerberg, S., & Timme, M. (2017). Model-free inference of direct network interactions from nonlinear collective dynamics. Nature Communications, 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02288-4

Choi, T. M., Wallace, S. W., & Wang, Y. (2018). Big Data Analytics in Operations Management. Production and Operations Management, 27(10), 1868-1883. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12838

Gallala, A., Kumar, A. A., Hichri, B., & Plapper, P. (2022). Digital Twin for Human–Robot Interactions by Means of Industry 4.0 Enabling Technologies. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22134950

Guo, M., Zhang, Q., Liao, X., Chen, F. Y., & Zeng, D. (2019). A hybrid machine learning framework for analyzing human decision-making through learning preferences. Omega. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2020.102263

Hermann, M., Pentek, T., & Otto, B. (2016). Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios. 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 3928-3937. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.488

Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., & Helbig, J. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. German National Academy of Science and Engineering.

Kallenborn, O., & Taübe, F. (2014). Complex Adaptive Socio-Technical Systems: The Role of Socio-Technical Networks in New Product Development. Organization Studies. DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2387287

Lu, Y. (2017). Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications, and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 6, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005

Mubarak, M.F., Evans, R, Ahumada-Tello, E.(2024). Manufacturing in Industry 4.0: A Scoping Review of Open Innovation Practices and Future Research. 6, 1-10

Schlick, C. M., Duckwitz, S., & Schneider, S. (2013). Project dynamics and emergent complexity. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory. DOI: 10.1007/s10588-012-9132-z

Schuh, G., Rudolf, S., & Mattern, C. (2016). Conceptual framework for evaluation of complexity in new product development projects. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT). DOI: 10.1109/ICIT.2016.7474894

Spill, H. (2012). The Influence of Complexity in Determining New Product Development Strategies. Victoria University of Wellington. DOI: 10.26686/wgtn.17003644.v1

Sung, T. K. (2018). Industry 4.0: A Korea perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 40-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.005

Tao, F., Qi, Q., Liu, A., & Kusiak, A. (2018). Data-driven smart manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 48, 157-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.01.006

Tolk, A., Harper, A., & Mustafee, N. (2020). Hybrid models as transdisciplinary research enablers. European Journal of Operational Research, 291(3), 1075-1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.10.010

Zhong, R. Y., Xu, X., & Klotz, E. (2020). Smart Manufacturing in the Era of Industry 4.0. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 54, 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.02.001

Received: 2024-12-19
Published: 2024-12-19
How to Cite
Ahumada Tello, E., Ramos Higuera, K. G., & Perusquia Velasco, J. (2024). Synergy of AI and Human Factors: Innovation and Complexity in the Development of New Products in Industry 4.0. Iberoamerican Journal of Complexity and Economics Sciences, 2(4), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.48168/ricce.v2n4p77