THE PROBLEM OF ETHICS: THE COEXISTENCE. Ethics and Artificial Intelligence

Keywords: The sciences of complexity, Artificial Life, Moral philosophy, Coexistence, Technology

Abstract

This article claims that the main issue posed by artificial intelligence (AI) is the human capacity to coexist with technology. AI presents challenges to humans like never before. To address this, it is essential to precisely review what ethics is and what it consists of. The first argument asserts that ethics is not, in any way, a matter of values, principles, or ideas; rather, it is about the problem of coexistence. The second argument states that AI is, by far, the best and most sophisticated form of technology; however, when viewed closely, it is much more than just technology. The third argument highlights that AI is actually artificial life (AL) and provides supporting arguments. The fourth argument holds that the most complex problem for humans is coexistence. Specifically, it is about living with other species and other forms of life. In the end, some open-ended conclusions are drawn.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
References

Asimov, I., (2009). Yo, Robot. Barcelona: Editora y Distribuidora Hispanoamericana, S. A.

Benjamin, R., (2019). Race After Technology. Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Wiley & Sons

Boden, M., (2016). AI. Its Nature and Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Chaisson, E., (2001). Cosmic Evolution. The Rise of Complexity in Nature. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press

Coekelberg, M., (2020). Artificial Intelligence Ethics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press

Couldry, N., and Mejias, U. A., (2019). The Costs of Connection. How Data is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating it for Capitalism. Stanford University Press

Crawford, K., (2021). Atlas of AI. Power, Politics and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. Yale University Press

Darwin, C., (1995). The Origin of Species by Means of natural Selection. New York: The Classics of Science Library

Eubanks, V., (2019). Automating Inequality. How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St. Martin Press

Geman, D., Geman, S., Hallonquist, N., Younes, L., (2015). “Visual Turing Test for Computer Visual Systems”, en: PNAS, vol. 112, No. 12, pp. 3618-3623; doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422953112

Gonçalves, B., (2023). “The Turing Test is a Thought Experiment”, en: Minds & Machines 33, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-022-09616-8

Gould, S. J., (2002). The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press

Hart, D., Sussman, R. W., (2009). Man the Hunted. Primates, Predators, and Human Evolution, Expanded Edition. London: Routledge

Janik, A., y Toulmin, S., (2021). La Viena de Wittgenstein. Sevilla: Athenaica

Lee, K-F., (2018). AI Superpowers. China, Silicon Valley and the New World Order. Harper Business

Maldonado, C. E., (2022). “LaMDA no piensa, siente. Un muy sensible debate sobre la mente y su complejidad”, en: Revista de Filosofía. Universidad de Zulia, vol. 39, edición especial No. 2, págs. 55-66; doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7297088

Maldonado, C. E., (2021) “Saber vivir bien es un asunto de la filosofía”, en: Revista Ciencias de la Complejidad, vol. 2 No. 2, págs. 37-44; doi: https://doi.org/10.48168/cc022021-004

Maldonado, C. E., (2017). “Positive affirmation of non-algorithmic information processing”, en: Cinta de Moebio, 60, pp. 279-285, doi: https://doi.org10.4067/S0717-554X2017000300279

Margulis, L., Sagan, D., (2003). Captando genomas. Una teoría sobre el origen de las especies. Prólogo de Ernst Mayr. Barcelona: Kairós

Mei, Q., Xie, Y., Jackson, M. O., (2024). “A Turing test of whether AI chatbots are behaviorally similar to humans”, en: PNAS, vol. 121, No. 9, e2313925121; doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2313925121

Mitchell, M., (2024). “Debates on the nature of artificial general intelligence”, en: Science, 21 marzo, vol. 383, issue 6689; doi: https/doi.org/10.1126/science.ado7069

O’Neil, C., (2017). Weapons of Math Destruction. How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Crown

Passmore, J., (1986). Hundred years of Philosophy. Penguin Books

Russell, S., (2020). Human Compatible. Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press

Sartre, J.-P., (2000). Huis clos. Les mouches. Paris: Gallimard

Schaeffer, J.-M.., (20009). El fin de la excepción humana. México, D. F.: F. C. E.

Scharre, P., (2018). Army of None. Autonomous Weapons and the Future of War. W. W. Norton & Company

Smolin, L., (1998). The Life of the Cosmos. New York-London: Oxford University Press

Tegmark, M., (2014). Our Mathematical Universe. My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality. New York: Vintage Books

The Integrative HMP (iHMP) Research Network Consortium, (2019). “The Integrative Human Microbiome Project”, en: Nature 569, 641–648; doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1238-8

Turing, A. M., (1950). “Computing machinery and intelligence”, en: Mind, Volume LIX, Issue 236, October 1950, Pages 433–460; doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433

Turnbaugh, P., Ley, R., Hamady, M. et al., (2007). “The Human Microbiome Project”, en: Nature 449, 804–810; doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06244

Wilson, E. O., (2012). The Social Conquest of Earth. New York-London: Liveright Publishing Corporation

Zerilli, J., et al., (2021). A Citizen’s Guide to Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press

European Commission, (2019). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI; disponible en: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai

OEA, (2022). Cátedra de las Américas: “Política en la Era Digital: Inteligencia Artificial y Democracia”; disponible en: https://www.oas.org/es/centro_noticias/comunicado_prensa.asp?sCodigo=AVI-057/22

Unesco, (2021). Recomendation on the Ethics of Artificial Life; disponible en: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380455

Received: 2024-06-30
Published: 2024-06-30
How to Cite
Maldonado, C. E. (2024). THE PROBLEM OF ETHICS: THE COEXISTENCE. Ethics and Artificial Intelligence. Iberoamerican Journal of Complexity and Economics Sciences, 2(2), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.48168/ricce.v2n2p31